Ideas and politics in social science research
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Experimenting with Politics SOCIAL SCIENCE
clicking here. colleagues, clients, or customers by , you can order high-quality copies for your If you wish to distribute this article to others here. following the guidelines can be obtained by Permission to republish or repurpose articles or portions of articles ): March 8, 2012 www.sciencemag.org (this infomation is current as of The following resources related to this article are availab...
متن کامل“Place” as an Integrating Concept in Natural Resource Politics: Propositions for a Social Science Research Agenda
This article lays out six propositions centering on a relationship between people-place connections and strategic behavior in natural resource politics. The first two propositions suggest a strong and direct connection between self-identity, place, and how individuals perceive and value the environment. The third, fourth, and fifth propositions tie together social group identity and place, part...
متن کاملTransforming power: Social science and the politics of energy choices
This paper addresses key implications in momentous current global energy choices – both for social science and for society. Energy can be over-used as a lens for viewing social processes. But it is nonetheless of profound importance. Understanding possible ‘sustainable energy’ transformations requires attention to many tricky issues in social theory: around agency and structure and the interpla...
متن کاملValidity and Reliability in Social Science Research
Concepts of reliability and validity in social science research are introduced and major methods to assess reliability and validity reviewed with examples from the literature. The thrust of the paper is to provide novice researchers with an understanding of the general problem of validity in social science research and to acquaint them with approaches to developing strong support for the validi...
متن کاملShooting the messenger: the science and politics of ethnicity research.
Scientific arguments showing 'how the world is' are fundamentally different from political assertions about 'how the world should be'. Ideologically motivated political attacks can hamper our understanding of mental disorders by preventing academics from pursuing research in contentious areas. Evidence should be countered by better evidence, not by shooting the messenger.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política
سال: 2011
ISSN: 0103-3352
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-33522011000200014